Sign Up / Log In

The Faceoff Circle is a membership supported hockey website. If you want to help continue the growth of the platform, you can name your price of contribution and gain access to premium features!

Already a member? Log in here.


Why the three-centre, seven-defencemen idea makes no sense

Why the three-centre, seven-defencemen idea makes no sense

With offseasons come lineup blenders, and with lineup blenders come fun ideas. One of the most interesting ideas, at least as far as sheer uniqueness goes, is that the Toronto Maple Leafs should run three centres and seven defencemen next year. As radical of an idea as this is, the rationale given is pretty simple:

  • The Maple Leafs now have three legitimate first-line centres (John Tavares, Auston Matthews, and Nazem Kadri) who are capable of playing a 20-minute share per night, eliminating the need to have a fourth centre at all and making wingers fluid.
  • A seventh defenceman would keep Toronto’s six from getting tired, and perhaps allow for someone to dress as a “specialist”, used only in specific game situations where Mike Babcock likes to have certain types of players.

It seems sensible on the surface, but there are quite a few flaws to the concept.

This is a premium post and as such, you are only seeing a portion of the content. The full post is available to subscribers only. These subscriptions help keep the site operational and come at an affordable cost, with all sorts of additional features. To learn more and/or register, click here. Thank you!

You might be interested in …

Comments are closed.